Tag: Performance coaching

  • Self-Reflection – An Essential Analytical Skill with a  Brief How-to Guide  for Professional Investors

    Self-Reflection – An Essential Analytical Skill with a Brief How-to Guide for Professional Investors

    Self-reflection:  Looking at the Psychology of Finance Through a Psychoanalytic Lens

    Fifth in a Series

    Self-awareness has tangible business benefits.  It allows you to know your what your blind spots are, what triggers an emotional over-reaction, what makes you risk too little or too much, what psychological state you’re in and what the implications of that are and when you’re fatigued or not functioning at your best. All these psychological elements can distort your assessment of a situation and deform your decision-making process. Self-awareness also allows you to know how you’re perceived by others, an essential aspect of every successful negotiation.

    While self-knowledge [i]comes more easily to some than others, there is a distinct, definable analytical process that leads to it—self-reflection.  Just like investors develop analytical skills to interpret activity and anomalies in the market, learning and practicing self-analytic techniques can help you develop a greater sensitivity to patterns, trends, and anomalies in your psychic state.  Self-reflection needs to be an ongoing mental process, operating most of the time in the background. It isn’t something you do on a fifteen-minute meditative break.

    Reflection and insight are the foundations of psychoanalysis. They are teachable skills that can be learned and honed over time.  Here is a how-to guide to get you started on penetrating the less accessible aspects of your own mental life.

    Practice these techniques:

    1. Practice turning your mental gaze inward and start asking yourself questions. What just happened? What am I feeling? What am I thinking?  Why did I do that?
    2. Try to let your mind loose—ask a question but don’t force an answer. Let a question like “What’s going on with me?” hover and see what comes to your mind.  Avoid quickly foreclosing on an answer because the first  answer is usually not the complete one.  See if images, memories or thoughts pop up in your mind.  If you are able to visualize your mind as a space, check the corners and out-of-the way spots to see if anything is lurking there in the shadows.
    3. Don’t rush to a conclusion. Always ask “What else could it mean/be/signify?”  “What else might have happened?”  Ask “If this conclusion is wrong, what could be the answer?”  Try reversing your assumption.  For example, if you think “I felt anxious because my manager was mad at me”, try reversing it to “I am anxious because I’m mad at my manager” and consider whether that feels right.
    4. Think associatively rather than in a linear manner. That’s how our emotional minds work.  One thought or feeling is linked to another in an ever expanding and deepening network.  Put something—an event– in the center of your mind—let’s say you broke one of your investing rules with bad results— and see what comes to your mind in relation to it. “I felt bored, and didn’t feel like waiting”.  Or “I was pissed that my numbers were bad and I just wanted a win”.    Do you remember Magic 8 Balls, where an answer would float to the surface?  It’s kind of like that.  Rather than the logical analysis we’re trained in, this is an exercise that allows different parts of your mind to make themselves heard.
    5. When you’ve hit on an important and “true” insight it’s likely to connect with a thunk— “Oh yeah that’s it.” There should be a mild physical and emotional response that is absent with other hypotheses.
    6. Once you think you’ve got something figured out (e.g. “I’m anxious because I’m angry”) go a step further. Ask yourself why that made you mad.  Repeat the process of letting your mind loose (see #2).  Rather than jumping to an answer, let your mind go and see what comes into it.
    7. Keep going to more and more layers. Start with the insight “I’m anxious because I’m angry”.  Then it occurs to you, “I’m angry because I was humiliated”.  Good progress.  Then, ask “Why was I humiliated to that intense degree?” Now you realize, “I was humiliated because I’m always extremely sensitive to exposure of a vulnerability”.  Now you’ve got a useful piece of self-awareness you can work with.  You know you can’t stand people seeing you as vulnerable, so you tend to overreact, become enraged; that makes you uncomfortable so you become anxious.  Once you’ve gotten this far, it’s much easier to accept the feeling and control your reaction.  You know, now, you hate being exposed as vulnerable, you’ll always be sensitive to that, but you’ll survive. This awareness gives you a chance to think before acting on your emotional reactivity.  What really does the damage is the anger, anxiety and consequent impulsivity, not the fundamental emotional sensitivity.
    8. Pay attention to sequences. Event>emotion>thought>emotion>action.  Or emotion>action>emotion>event. Knowledge about your personal repetitive thought/emotion/behavior patterns is extremely useful because it gives you the ability to interrupt a destructive sequence. To get a handle on habitual sequences, start with an action you regret, like breaking an investing rule.  Ask yourself what happened before that.  “I had a conversation with R, another PM, and he got me feeling competitive.  I wanted something to happen fast”. If you can identify that as a repetitive pattern, you can be vigilant, knowing that a conversation that makes you feel like you’re failing the competition is likely to lead to riskier bets.  Alert to that, you can block action-consequences the next time you meet R in the hall and he makes you feel small.  You’re basically substituting thought, in the form of self-awareness (understanding your emotional reactions) for impulsive action. The paradigm is “When I’m in this typical situation, I respond with this typical emotion which can lead to that typical action”.
    9. Learn about different broad-stroke states you experience over time. Many investors cycle through periods of elation/ excitement/optimism and pessimism/deflation.  Your mood cycles may or may not coincide with the market’s.  Recognize what emotional state you are in, and know it won’t last forever.  While you are in a given state, your thinking may be different.  The cognitive biases you are prey to may not be the same when you are in an elated, excited state as when you are in a pessimistic state of mind.  Learn how you think and make decisions in each different emotional state.
    10. Accept that you are not rational. No one is.  The point is not to make sense of your feelings or thoughts, but to get to know them.

    copyright September 2017

    Invantage Advising

    ###

    [i] I am using self-awareness and self-knowledge interchangeable.  Take your pick.  Self-reflection is the means to that end.

    More Posts in this series:

    For Professional Investors:  A Couple of Things You Should Know About Anxiety

    For Professional Investors:  Why You Won’t Follow Your Own Rules and What to Do About It

    Why Professional Investors Need to Understand the Concept of Disavowal

    Why Professional Investors Need to Understand the Concept of Regression

  • For Professional Investors:  A Couple of Things You Should Know about Anxiety

    For Professional Investors: A Couple of Things You Should Know about Anxiety

    Anxiety:  Looking at the Psychology of Finance Through a Psychoanalytic Lens

    Fourth in a Series

     

    Anxiety is ubiquitous. It serves an essential function—alerting us to danger, to the need to reassess the environment, to act.

    It is a both  physical and emotional. Anxiety is a state of biological arousal that is actively communicating something to you: “Wake up, pay attention, get out of danger”.

    As with all other psychological phenomena I describe in this series, you can’t avoid anxiety—to do so would be akin to being a person who doesn’t experience pain, and is therefore very vulnerable to injury.  But by understanding it, knowing your personal anxiety-related idiosyncrasies, and learning to listen to and manage anxiety you can both use it and also avoid falling prey to mistakes anxiety can contribute to.

    Anxiety disorders develop when anxiety gets way out of hand, taking on a life of its own.  There’s often a genetic contribution to these mental health conditions that include panic disorder and OCD.  But in this post, I’m talking about “normal” anxiety that rises in everyone and anyone under certain conditions—and it can be pretty intense and still normal.

    Intense anxiety bordering on panic is incredibly uncomfortable.  Most of us will do anything we can to avoid it or stop it.  There’s nothing inherently wrong with this strategy, unless the avoidance-thing-you-do becomes a habit or leads you to ignore important incoming data.

    In moderate doses anxiety is alerting.  In large doses, it is disorganizing.  So, in addition to recognizing anxiety and it’s sources, you need to learn to assess your level of anxiety and act accordingly.

    Although we talk about different types of anxiety, the subjective experience is a final common pathway for multiple triggers or sources.

    In this post, I’m going to describe four kinds of anxiety that might be under your radar.  This is not meant to be an exhaustive list.  But these are some variations of anxiety that I think you should know about:

    Annihilation anxiety-Psychoanalysts consider this the most primitive and disorganizing kind of anxiety.  “Annihilation” refers to psychological, not physical undoing.  Under sway of this type of anxiety, you feel that you can’t get ahold of yourself, or you’re falling apart, or you’re losing your grip.  Things can feel unreal and fractured. The circumstances where this kind of anxiety might occur include emotional overload or an extreme amount of change or disruption, dislocation, or loss of customary supports.  Even positive events can be overwhelming in this way.

    Annihilation anxiety tends to be non-specific, so even with skillful introspection you’re not going to come up with a distinct cause or solvable problems. Consider this report from John D. Rockefeller, Sr., looking back on his early years building Standard Oil:

    “For years on end I never had a solid night’s sleep, worrying about how it was to come out…I tossed about in bed night after night worrying over the outcome…All the fortune that I have made has not served to compensate for the anxiety of that period”. (quoted in Titan, Ron Chernow, p. 122).

    A few things are striking about the Rockefeller quote. Notice that his anxiety is diffuse. He’s not worrying about this contract or that refinery, but, vaguely, “how it was to come out”.  And the intensity and pain of his anxiety is clear from the fact that it is still so vivid decades later, as well as in his statement that all his subsequent riches don’t make up for it.

    Annihilation anxiety’s primary value is to tell you that you are overwhelmed.  It doesn’t signal specific problems to solve.

    Narcissistic anxiety—I’ve never met a single person who doesn’t hate feeling humiliated, exposed or shamed.  Anxiety comes in to this picture in two ways.  First, each of us has a different threshold of tolerance for these experiences.  If you’re a person with a thin skin who is easily humiliated or often feels exposed, you’re likely to have chronic anxiety worrying that this very uncomfortable experience is about to occur.  This anticipatory anxiety can skew your decision making. The second entry point for narcissistic anxiety comes after you are embarrassed/humiliated/exposed by something dumb you did.  If you’re overly aware of or sensitive to what people might think, you’re going to lose focus worrying about how they are viewing you rather than collecting yourself and getting back to work.

    Traumatic anxiety- Here, I’m talking about real but not overwhelming traumatic experiences.  Trauma states occur when events override your customary coping mechanisms. We are vulnerable to traumatic states when events are unprecedented, unpredicted, unfamiliar, sudden.  During the height of Hurricane Harvey, the National Weather Service tweeted: “This event is unprecedented & all impacts are unknown & beyond anything experienced”.  To me, the NWS description of this level of uncertainty meant the forecasters there were subject to traumatic levels of anxiety, not to mention 1st responders and emergency managers.

    Idiosyncratic Anxiety –anxiety reactions that are unique to you. Some things are going to make you anxious that don’t make other people anxious.  I’m not talking about something clear-cut, like you are afraid of flying and others are not, but a subtler pattern of reactivity that stems from your individual temperament and psychological history.  Let’s say everyone acknowledges that the market is over-valued; prices are too high but they are still going up.  Your colleagues are on the boat still making money on the rising tide.  You’ve done well too, but have a much stronger urge than your peers to get out of your long bets before your stocks’ value has peaked.  The excitement seems crazy to you and makes you very, very nervous. The over-excited market correctly makes you anxious, sending a useful signal that this can’t last.  But your anxiety response may be a shade too strong if you especially can’t stand this kind of irrationality and you’re apt to pull the plug too soon.  Remember, anxiety is always a useful signal.  But you need to make sure that you don’t over-react or under-react to it.

    What you can do

    As with every psychology factor that can effect investment decisions, information and self-knowledge is the most important remedy.  Understand and accept that anxiety is normal and inevitable.

    See my blog post on self-reflection for some insights on building insight and self-awareness.

    If your anxiety has the characteristics of annihilation anxiety, the best immediate antidote is to do something concrete and manageable with a definable endpoint. Update your charts or your trading journal.  Organize your desk or your sticky notes. Cling to your routines and habits.  Don’t make decisions until you can think more clearly.  Get something to eat, drink a bottle of water, go to the gym.

    When your anxiety is related to humiliation or exposure, try a conversation with yourself.  Acknowledge that you hate the feeling of humiliation because, well, it’s just plain awful—but remind yourself you’ll survive.   Then look at your decisions carefully and see if any are being swayed by a desire to avoid being humiliated.  The point isn’t to get rid of the feeling, because you can’t, at least not in the short run.  The goal is to avoid compounding the problem by letting it lead you to bad financial decisions.  In the end, it’s better to make a good investment decision and risk being embarrassed than to make a bad one in a probably futile effort to avoid humiliation.

    Get to know yourself better so you are intimately acquainted with your idiosyncratic sources of anxiety.  Look carefully at how these patterns of emotional reactivity might be systematically tilting your investment decisions.  Add rules to your trading program to prevent yourself from making systematic anxiety-based errors.  Read more on the psychology of trading rules and why you will inevitably break them in this related post.

    ###

    copyright September 2017

    Invantage Advising

    Other posts in this series:

    For Professional Investors:  Why You Won’t Follow Your Own Rules and What to Do About It

    Why Professional Investors Need to Understand the Concept of Disavowal

    Why Professional Investors Need to Understand the Concept of Regression

  • Billions’ Wendy Rhoades-A Performance Review of the Superstar Performance Coach

    Billions’ Wendy Rhoades-A Performance Review of the Superstar Performance Coach

    I’ve heard several portfolio managers say they wish they could find someone like Wendy Rhoades, performance coach extraordinaire on the wonderful TV show Billions.  With the TV show  about to launch it’s second season, I thought it would be a good time (and fun) to offer a professional critique of Wendy’s technique. Bottom line–she’s not bad.  Especially later in Season 1, she shows how  unconscious motivations can lead to very costly decisions, and more importantly how reflection and self awareness of the emotions involved in critical decisions can potentially avoid costly mistakes.  Below is the text of a blog post I wrote for Huffington Post, which you can read on HuffPo here.

     

     

    Just how good is Wendy Rhodes?  She’s described by her admirers as “the best performance coach in the business”.  I thought the launch of Season 2 of Billions might be a good time for a performance review for Wendy herself.

     

    Showtime, the cable network home of Billions, where Wendy plies her trade, describes her as

     

    “A psychiatrist by trade, Wendy Rhodes combines an avid intellect with a keen understanding of human nature.  She used those skills to help Bobby Axelrod build his edge run from the ground up and now works as the company’s star in-house performance coach.”

     

    Until the prequel, we have to take Bobby’s word for it that Wendy helped him build his hedge fund from the ground up.  I’m not going to quibble with an “avid intellect” and a “keen understanding of human nature.”

     

    Like Wendy, I’m a psychiatrist, do performance coaching and business consulting.  Foregoing modesty, I will describe myself as also having an avid intellect, and share her keen understanding of human nature.  I thought viewers might appreciate an assessment of the quality of Wendy’s work.  I don’t think Wendy would mind.  Peer consultation and supervision is a standard tool psychiatrists and analysts make use of to keep us on our toes.  We use colleagues to help us overcome blind spots and check for systematic errors.  Not unlike a how a good performance coach can help an investor!

     

    Wendy calls the people she works with “patients” —a mistake in my opinion, for lots of reasons.  They are her clients, or more correctly Axe Capital is her client. One hopes she doesn’t prescribe medication if they get clinically depressed, or for their ADHD, and that when they need therapy—for relationship problems, significant anxiety or depression, or anything outside the field of their investment performance– she refers them to a competent colleague for confidential treatment outside the transparent walls of Axe capital.  I’m sure she would agree.

     

    How good is her technique and skill when actually working with a client?  To my eye it ranges from pretty cheesy to not-too-bad (Pilot, Season 1) to pretty damn good (Season 1, Episode 11).

    In the pilot we see Wendy at work in two “sessions” (Personally I’d call them meetings.  This is business.  It’s like therapy, but it’s not therapy).

     

    image: Showtime

    Mick Danzig, played by Nathan Darrow, has scheduled an appointment because he feels he’s “lost his mojo”. Everyone else in the firm is up double digits, and he’s down 4%.  He’s lost his confidence, wonders if he’s depressed and needs some Prozac (or something).  After asking a few good and important questions (is he sleeping, eating, exercising, having sex, ok at home?) Wendy firmly announces that he doesn’t need medication—he needs to believe in himself again.  She says he’s listening to the “wrong voice”—the loud one telling him he’s “just fucking stupid” rather than the quiet one inside that is telling him “where the alpha is.”

    Using the word “alpha” correctly in a sentence immediately identifies Wendy as a true insider.  I’m not going to try, but suffice it to say that being good at “finding where the alpha is” is what makes you a superstar, and a lot of money. Wendy makes Mick stand up and “confess” that he made 7.2 million last year. She insists he’s got to FEEL that power inside.  There’s some chest pounding and impassioned encouragement. Wendy tells Mick forcefully that he’s among the elite— “you’re in the special forces here—you are a Navy SEAL—Did the SEALS make a mistake signing you up?  No the SEALS don’t make mistakes!  So get out there and do what needs to be done!”

    This is kind of clever.  Wendy appeals to Mick’s narcissism (“you’re part of the elite”) while simultaneously reminding him of a broader network of authority and brotherhood (the SEALs) that has decided he’s of value so he doesn’t need to make his own decision about himself.  In a sense he can lean on the group identification while he regains his balance.

    Mick leaves looking decidedly perkier, returning later in the episode with a good bet that earns Bobby’s approval, millions for the firm, and a shy grateful smile for Wendy.

    With Mick, Wendy is using the tools of suggestion and motivational exhortation.  She uses the force of her own personality and alleged belief in Mick (I didn’t find this entirely convincing) to transfer some energy and confidence into him.  I’d call this good old sports coaching and not much more sophisticated than a talented high school football coach. Clever in parts, this session is fraught with manipulation and suggestion, and contains no help for Mick that will foster self-awareness or growth.

    Contrast it with an encounter in the pilot between Wendy and Bobby. Bobby is wrestling with an impulse to buy an extraordinarily lavish and expensive house.  He tells Wendy that he knows that buying the beach mansion will “unleash the hounds” (of envy and criticism) and that “makes me want it even more”.   Wendy congratulates him for understanding the motivation before he makes the purchase, saying that he’s come a long way since they first started working together— “You wouldn’t have recognized the motivation until after the fact”.  She’s underlining that through their work he’s increased his capacity for self-reflection, gained  knowledge about his own motivation and developed a greater ability to delay action in favor of reflective thought.  Wendy leaves him with the thought that understanding is still not enough—he also needs to exercise control.  Axe says he has no one else to talk to like this, and that’s undoubtedly true.  Wendy is working at a much more sophisticated level here compared to her session with Mick. There’s an ongoing process with Bobby, where they’re working on his capacity to be reflective and self-aware and use that to make better decisions (i.e. exercise control when needed).  After praising Wendy for her contribution to his greater self-awareness and self-control, Bobby gets provoked by her husband Chuck and knowingly overrides his self-awareness, giving in to the impulse to buy the house.

    Fast forward to Season one, Episode 11—Bobby has just made a colossal mistake on a company.  Deliberately ignoring the warnings of his entire staff of analysts, he places an enormous bet that leads to a loss of hundreds of millions of dollars.  Impressively (maybe we have Wendy to thank for this) he doesn’t blame anyone, but immediately knows that the misjudgment arose from his head, not a miscalculation of the market, and asks Wendy for an emergency meeting.  In a long, intimate conversation (that Wendy’s husband observes and mistakenly imagines to be romantic or sexual) the two of them explore the “mistake”. Wendy keeps bringing Bobby back to Donny, his long time friend and co-worker who has recently died (with a very complicated backstory).  The viewer knows, but Wendy doesn’t, that Bobby has a secret reason to feel guilty about Donny’s death—for his own gain, he withheld information about potential treatment that could have prolonged Donny’s life.

    Nevertheless, Axe has plenty of other things to feel guilty about.  He admits to Wendy that he felt relief when Donny died; that if he felt any sadness it was deeply buried.  He admits his greatest fear to Wendy—could he be a sociopath, someone who doesn’t have the capacity to feel?  With great insight and compassion, I thought, Wendy tells him that he showed his guilt by blowing the bet—punishing himself via both the financial loss and the humiliation in front of his people. She points out that a normal person wouldn’t engage in the behavior he does—but a sociopath wouldn’t care about the consequences.  He comes back with a penetrating observation about himself and Wendy — that neither of their “wires” are where they should be—they’re both outliers.

    This encounter is moving and effective as drama, and also good TV psychoanalysis.  Together Wendy and Bobby explore the way unconscious feelings—in this case guilt—can lead to apparently irrational decisions.  But there is a psychic logic to Bobby’s action.  Unconscious guilt led to a need to punish himself which led to the bad bet which “fixed” the psychological problem.  This is the real deal, and shows how unconscious motives can cause terrible mistakes in business.  The process also offers the hope that when making consequential decisions, a deeper understanding of one’s psychology including unconscious feelings and fantasies, could actually prevent costly repeated mistakes.

    Wendy is identified from the outset as a psychiatrist, but this later work with Bobby makes it clear that her orientation is at least in part psychoanalytic.  She listens in an analytic way, hearing not just the words but the spaces between, the evasions and changes of topic, showing that sometimes the “negative space” in a conversation points to the most important issues.  And she uses her understanding of the unconscious and its link to motivation and choice to powerful effect.  She was great.

    A few details in the series made me squirm.  That’s a problem all professionals face, I think, when they see dramatic representations of their work.  The departures from real life practice, whether done out of ignorance by the writers and producers, or more probably for dramatic purposes, are ridiculously painful.  I want to yell at Wendy for being so stupid about her supposedly confidential notes—for one thing they were dumb and unnecessary, and for another, leaving them on her laptop on bed at home was inexcusable.  Couldn’t the writers have found another way to give Chuck a shot at Bobby without such a dumb violation of professional practice? Wendy should have known enough to keep no notes at all.

    OK, and I have to say something about her clothes.  Black leather leggings in the pilot, some low cut tops later on.  A little too sexy, but more importantly too intrusive into the relationships she’s engaged in. She also works a little too hard to maintain control of the physical space—for example, forcing Bobby to come to the “patient” chair before she’ll begin their “session”.  She’s forcing people to pay attention to her and acknowledge her power —my read is rather than demonstrating her power with these moves, she’s showing a bit of lack of confidence. She’s trying a little too hard, I think, to prove she’s as powerful as the boys.  And all along, they’re desperate for her attention and care.

    Compared to other television and film psychiatrists, Wendy’s awfully damn good.